Social media is an open
forum where everyone can be creative and permits us to be heard. It provides
certain individuals the opportunity to reach wider audiences, crating an online
community and space for a discussion. Instagram is well-known social media for
sharing pictures and thoughts and its main concern is to have users post appropriate
content which does not violate its norms. The common idea is that you should
not post a picture which you would not show to your children, boss or parents.
This includes nudity or mature content and violence. However, there are different
degrees of censorship to control the portrayal of male and female bodies. For
instance, “King of Instagram” Dan Bilzerian, with over 16,4 million followers,
usually posts photos of women, guns and trips to Vegas. Photos of Kim
Kardashian West’s bottom are allowed to stay, while female nipples or other
bare body parts which do not belong to her or other famous people are considered
to be inappropriate and taken down. There are examples of people who tried to
show normal body functions or body images. Canadian photographer and fashion designer,
Petra Collins, uploaded a photo of herself that showed her pubic hair emerging
from bikini bottoms. The photo did not show any signs of nudity nor did it
break any of Instagram’s terms and conditions yet was deleted by Instagram.
Petra thinks it was deleted because it simply did not meet society’s standards
of feminity. Rupi Kaur, Canadian poet and artist, posted a picture of herself fully
clothed but with a spot of blood between her legs and on the sheets. Instagram
removed it twice, claiming that the photo violated their norms. Kaur says that “it
is okay to sell what’s between a woman’s legs, more than it is okay to mention
its inner workings.” After Kaur posted the whole story on Facebook and it was liked
and shared by thousands of people, her post suddenly reappeared on her
Instagram profile. It is surprising, however, that Instagram claims to prohibit
images that are “violent, nude, partially nude, discriminatory, unlawful, infringing,
hateful, pornographic or sexually suggestive”, yet examples of these two
harmless pictures were taken down. Standards of nudity between genders are far
from equal in many countries but it is shocking that Instagram, which claims to
be a platform for expressing ourselves, deletes posts just because they do not
fit society’s expectations (Faust, 2017).
Watch Rupi Kaur's explanation in the video below:
Watch Rupi Kaur's explanation in the video below:
References:
Faust, G. (2017). Hair,
Blood and the Nipple: Instagram Censorship and the Female Body. In Frömming U.,
Köhn S., Fox S., & Terry M. (Eds.), Digital Environments:
Ethnographic Perspectives Across Global Online and Offline Spaces (pp.
159-170). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1xxrxw.14
Comments
Post a Comment